• Home
  • Topics
    • Industry and air
    • Waste and TFS
    • Water and land
    • Nature protection
    • Cross-cutting tools and approaches
  • Tools
    • Permitting
    • Inspections
    • Doing the right things
    • Better regulation
    • IMPEL Review Initiative
    • PREVENT
  • Projects
    • IMPEL projects
    • IMPEL-ESIX
    • LIFE SWEAP
    • WasteForce
    • SPIDER WEB
  • News
    • Latest news
    • Press releases
  • Publications
    • Outreach material
    • IMPEL Documents
    • General Assembly Meetings
    • Conference reports
    • EU Documents
  • Events
    • Internal meetings
      • General assembly
      • Board meetings
      • Expert team meetings
    • Project meetings
    • Conferences
  • About IMPEL
    • Strategy
    • Organisation
      • Board
      • Secretariat
    • Members and observers
    • Becoming a member
    • Contact
  • 
  • 
  • 

IMPEL

European Union Network for the Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law

You are here: Home / Environmental Inspection Cycle (EIC) / Setting priorities

Setting priorities

Setting priorities starts with a risk assessment. Risk should be understood here in a broad sense: it includes any factor an authority wants to take into account when assigning priorities. It may be an environmental risk, a social or economic risk, a compliance risk etc. The method used for risk assessment should be objective in nature, simple to apply and can differ between inspecting authorities.

Limited resources on the one hand and a multitude and variety of statutory tasks on the other, make it necessary to set clear priorities. Priorities are set using the outcome of the risk assessment, which could be a list or an overview of all the identified/selected installations and activities and their respective risks. These installations and activities can on the basis of their assessed risks be classified, for example, in ‘high risk’, ‘medium risk’ and ‘low risk’. In addition the inspection approach for each level can differ: the higher the risk level, the more attention it will get from the inspecting authority. The inspection approach will as a consequence also determine the claim on the available resources, and is therefore equally relevant for the inspection plan and in the inspection schedule.

Levels of risk assessment

A risk assessment can be carried out on different levels. An inspecting authority with a large variety of tasks may in the first instance carry out an “abstract level” risk assessment between general task areas it is charged with (e.g. inspection of IPPC installations versus inspection on illegal logging versus spatial planning). In this document we call this a “general” risk assessment.

Risk assessment
Abstract or detailed risk assessment

However a unit within an inspecting authority that is only dealing with specific areas (e.g. IPPC installations) and has no other tasks, might only want to do a detailed level risk assessment (“specific” risk assessment). In other words, these different risk assessment processes are carried out in different levels of detail by the same or by different staff. Although the risk criteria might be different between these different levels of risk assessment the method could be the same. An inspecting authority may want consult third parties when performing a risk assessment. In particular consultation of other (inspecting) authorities can provide opportunities of sharing data, performing joint risk assessments etc.

 

A combination of risk assessments is also possible. Here carrying out a specific risk assessment further refines the outcomes of the general risk assessment. For example, in the general risk assessment priorities have been set between the different statutory tasks like inspection of IPPC installations, inspection of SEVESO installations, inspection against legal requirements on nature protection, inspection of waste transport etc. The outcome of the assessment is a risk score for every task, that can then be used as a guide to allocate available inspection time. This outcome is now the input for the specific risk assessments.

Combination of risk assessments
Combination of risk assessments

Here for example a risk assessment is done for each of the individual IPPC installations and each of the installations receive a risk score. Again inspection time will be allocated to the installations. The results of either of these methods will be that the Inspecting Authorities, using a clear and systematic process, will be able to assign resources between overall task areas and also within the specific work to be carried out within each overall task area.

This assignment of priorities enables the inspecting authority to explain what categories of installations or activities will get what amount of attention. These priorities and their corresponding inspection strategies can be communicated to stakeholders and other relevant parties. Here the inspecting authority also makes clear the difference in needed and available resources. In doing so, the inspecting authority ensures the transparency of the process for prioritising the work.

Input

Data for risk management.

Output

Assigned priorities.

Environmental Inspection Cycle

environmental inspection cycle

Newsletter

Join the IMPEL.eu newsletter list and stay up to date on all IMPEL.eu news.

Subscribe

Menu

  • Home
  • Topics
    • Industry and air
    • Waste and TFS
    • Water and land
    • Nature protection
    • Cross-cutting tools and approaches
  • Tools
    • Permitting
    • Inspections
    • Doing the right things
    • Better regulation
    • IMPEL Review Initiative
    • PREVENT
  • Projects
    • IMPEL projects
    • IMPEL-ESIX
    • LIFE SWEAP
    • WasteForce
    • SPIDER WEB
  • News
    • Latest news
    • Press releases
  • Publications
    • Outreach material
    • IMPEL Documents
    • General Assembly Meetings
    • Conference reports
    • EU Documents
  • Events
    • Internal meetings
      • General assembly
      • Board meetings
      • Expert team meetings
    • Project meetings
    • Conferences
  • About IMPEL
    • Strategy
    • Organisation
      • Board
      • Secretariat
    • Members and observers
    • Becoming a member
    • Contact
  • 
  • 
  • 

IMPEL

Chemin des deux maisons 73, box 3
1200, Brussels
Belgium
Phone: +44 (0)20 3289 7442
Email: info@impel.eu
Skype: impelsecretariat


Become a member

Membership of IMPEL is open to organisations or authorities working in the public sector who implement and enforce environmental legislation. Learn all about the benefits​ of being a member to our network.
Read More

Copyright © 2021 IMPEL · Data protection · Cookie policy · Webdesign: Alva Design