Sustainable Landspreading

Questo rapporto illustra i risultati della Fase III del progetto IMPEL "Sustainable Landspreading", che mirava a confrontare i diversi approcci alla gestione dei fanghi nei Paesi europei per evidenziare problemi, soluzioni e buone pratiche comuni. Il team del progetto ha aggiornato un questionario del 2021 e lo ha distribuito al team di esperti di acqua e terra dell'IMPEL e ad altri contatti, ricevendo risposte da 11 Paesi diversi nel 2024, per un totale di 17 risposte nazionali se combinate con l'indagine precedente. Le risposte hanno rivelato variazioni nella produzione di fanghi, nelle pratiche di distribuzione sul territorio, nei quadri normativi, nei metodi di trattamento e nelle priorità relative ai contaminanti, evidenziando una serie di sfide e approcci nella gestione sostenibile dei fanghi di depurazione.

The aims were to compare and contrast the different approaches to sludge management in different member countries and organisations to highlight common problems, solutions and areas of best practice as examples for others to learn from.

Exchange experiences about how the risk analysis for sampling farms for cross-compliance control can be performed. In addition the workshop dealt with the risk based control of livestock productions regulated by the Industrial Emissions Directive in order to explore possible common ground and inspiration. A

The aim of the conference was to gain a better understanding between IMPEL Members of environmental issues around the landspreading of waste and sludge to land and how they are regulated in different countries. Also, to explore possible synergies and co-operation in tackling the environmental impacts of these activities.

The report is about two issues: Wastewater Discharge Permitting and Manure Storage Capacity

The focus of the workshop was to review the outputs and findings from phase 1 of the SWETE project and use these to inform the planning of a conference.

This is a small first phase study designed to gain an overview of the regulatory methods and capabilities used by MS to implement the WFD. It seeks to identify areas of good practice and potential gaps in capability which may reduce the effectiveness of attainment of the WFD agreed outcomes.