Sustainable Landspreading

Dit rapport bevat de bevindingen van fase III van het IMPEL-project 'Duurzame verspreiding van slib', dat tot doel had verschillende benaderingen van slibbeheer in Europese landen met elkaar te vergelijken om gemeenschappelijke problemen, oplossingen en beste praktijken te benadrukken. Het projectteam werkte een vragenlijst uit 2021 bij en verspreidde deze onder IMPEL's Water and Land Expert Team en andere contactpersonen. In 2024 ontving het team antwoorden uit 11 verschillende landen, wat resulteerde in een totaal van 17 antwoorden per land wanneer deze met de vorige enquête werden gecombineerd. De antwoorden brachten variaties aan het licht in slibproductie, verspreidingspraktijken, regelgevingskaders, behandelingsmethoden en prioriteiten met betrekking tot verontreinigende stoffen, en benadrukten een reeks uitdagingen en benaderingen bij het duurzaam beheren van zuiveringsslib.

The aims were to compare and contrast the different approaches to sludge management in different member countries and organisations to highlight common problems, solutions and areas of best practice as examples for others to learn from.

Exchange experiences about how the risk analysis for sampling farms for cross-compliance control can be performed. In addition the workshop dealt with the risk based control of livestock productions regulated by the Industrial Emissions Directive in order to explore possible common ground and inspiration. A

The aim of the conference was to gain a better understanding between IMPEL Members of environmental issues around the landspreading of waste and sludge to land and how they are regulated in different countries. Also, to explore possible synergies and co-operation in tackling the environmental impacts of these activities.

The report is about two issues: Wastewater Discharge Permitting and Manure Storage Capacity

The focus of the workshop was to review the outputs and findings from phase 1 of the SWETE project and use these to inform the planning of a conference.

This is a small first phase study designed to gain an overview of the regulatory methods and capabilities used by MS to implement the WFD. It seeks to identify areas of good practice and potential gaps in capability which may reduce the effectiveness of attainment of the WFD agreed outcomes.